Methods and Global Environmental Governance

TitleMethods and Global Environmental Governance
Publication TypeJournal Article
Year of Publication2013
AuthorsO'Neill, Kate, Erika Weinthal, Kimberly R. Marion Suiseeya, Steven Bernstein, Avery Cohn, Michael W. Stone, and Benjamin Cashore
JournalAnnual Review of Environment and Resources
Volume38
Issue1
Pagination441-471
Abstract

This review analyzes the methods being used and developed in global environmental governance (GEG), an applied field that employs insights and tools from a variety of disciplines both to understand pressing environmental problems and to determine how to address them collectively. We find that methods are often underspecified in GEG research. We undertake a critical review of data collection and analysis in three categories: qualitative, quantitative, and modeling and scenario building. We include examples and references from recent studies to show when and how best to utilize these different methods to conduct problem-driven research. GEG problems are often characterized by institutional and issue complexity, linkages, and multiscalarity that pose challenges for many conventional methodological approaches. As a result, given the large methodological toolbox available to applied researchers, we recommend they adopt a reflective, pluralist, and often collaborative approach when choosing methods appropriate to these challenges.

URLhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev-environ-072811-114530
DOI10.1146/annurev-environ-072811-114530